Re: UUNET Pulling Peering Agreements & replacing them withcharging under non-disclosure?
Than it is to pay a telco alone for just the lines? I'd love to see how
Just a note about the cost of doing business in what I call this new internet. We are building both, the long hauls between cities and also purchasing the bandwidth from the 3 major player, MCI, SPRINT, and UUNET. We have 19 cities total, with DS3s from each of the 3 above in 7 of the 19 cities. All cities are tied together via long hauls. This was not the cheap way to do this, but it is the most effective. Major reason, when you peer, you can not manage the network connection. We get to manage our connections in the seven location with the major three. We also can get some nice routing done because we are buying access to their networks. I really think the best way to get this done is to buy transiting bandwidth from whom ever you want. I think the peering should be done in a managed way. The maes and naps are not really managed connections, they are best as best can to get through them. So if you every want and kind of QOS for your network, buy the bandwidth not a unmanaged/miss managed connection. To make the internet as stable as the voice systems then these interconnection (bandwidth) agreements must be put in place and managed with two adult parties, not several hundred meg a bit connections going into a switch trying to come out a DS3 straw. So buy the bandwidth and manage it. Gary Zimmerman V.P. of Network Engineering Savvis Communications Corp. email: garyz@savvis.com http://www.savvis.com Office: 314.719.2423 Address: 7777 Bonhomme Suite 1000 St. Louis, MO 63105 ---------- transit. the
participants (1)
-
garyz＠savvis.com