It worked! Huge Thanks Re: verizon trouble ticket NJ DQ04PWR9 -- is verizon blocking FLOKsociety.org by accident or on purpose?

Really glad i posted take a boqand thank you again! ============================================================= The COOK Report on Internet Protocol, (PSTN) 609 882-2572 Back Issues: http://www.cookreport.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=37&Itemid=61 Cook's Collaborative Edge Blog http://www.cookreport.com/wp/ Subscription info: http://www.cookreport.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=54&Itemid=65 ============================================================= On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:50 PM, "Moore, Matthew S" <mscott.moore@verizon.com> wrote:
Thanks eric...scott
From: Sieg, Eric W Sent: Friday, October 4, 2013 3:14 PM To: Christopher Morrow Cc: Moore, Matthew S; Gordon Cook; Young, David E Subject: RE: verizon trouble ticket NJ DQ04PWR9 -- is verizon blocking FLOKsociety.org by accident or on purpose?
Everything is complete, all associated prefix-lists for this customer have been updated.
Thank you for choosing Verizon,
Eric Sieg IP Non Managed Operations Support | IP/DNS/DNE Administration Tel: 248 728 5294 | Vnet: 443-5294
<image001.gif> <image002.jpg> <image003.jpg> <image004.jpg> <image005.jpg>
From: christopher.morrow@gmail.com [mailto:christopher.morrow@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:01 PM To: Sieg, Eric W Cc: Moore, Matthew S; Gordon Cook; Young, David E Subject: Re: verizon trouble ticket NJ DQ04PWR9 -- is verizon blocking FLOKsociety.org by accident or on purpose?
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Sieg, Eric W <eric.sieg@verizon.com> wrote: I’ll get it added to their other sites and follow up with them to let them know. Give me about 20.
sweet, thanks!
forgot, from a fios customer perspective: 2 G0-9-4-6.WASHDC-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net (130.81.183.118) 10.434 ms 6.308 ms 3.699 ms 3 ae6-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.199.146) 5.45 ms ae5-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.209.222) 3.375 ms ae2-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.199.138) 4.592 ms 4 0.ae4.XL2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.8.125) 8.32 ms 3.457 ms 5.700 ms 5 0.xe-9-3-0.GW9.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.36.34) 5.820 ms 0.xe-9-0-0.GW9.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.36.18) 7.311 ms 0.xe-11-2-1.GW9.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.42.2) 6.568 ms 6 telefonica-gw.customer.alter.net (152.179.50.114) 3.767 ms 4.74 ms 5.569 ms 7 Te0-7-0-5-grtmiana4.red.telefonica-wholesale.net (94.142.126.182) 48.345 ms 46.997 ms Xe4-1-6-0-grtmiana2.red.telefonica-wholesale.net(94.142.123.145) 46.154 ms 8 176.52.251.197 (176.52.251.197) 44.747 ms 176.52.251.189 (176.52.251.189) 74.746 ms 176.52.249.241 (176.52.249.241) 49.805 ms 9 176.52.252.66 (176.52.252.66) 99.787 ms 98.471 ms 97.103 ms ^C
looks like it works now.
Thank you for choosing Verizon,
Eric Sieg IP Non Managed Operations Support | IP/DNS/DNE Administration Tel: 248 728 5294 | Vnet: 443-5294
<image001.gif> <image002.jpg> <image003.jpg> <image004.jpg> <image005.jpg>
From: Moore, Matthew S Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:43 PM To: Christopher Morrow; Gordon Cook Cc: Young, David E; Sieg, Eric W Subject: RE: verizon trouble ticket NJ DQ04PWR9 -- is verizon blocking FLOKsociety.org by accident or on purpose?
Hi Chris,
Uncloaking..... ;-)
It does look as though it's a matter of an un-updated prefix-filter for telefonica. The existing filter allows a bunch of /24's
close to the address in question but 200.10.150.0/24 is not among them, whereas telefonica is announcing it to us. (shown, hidden, below)
scottm@GW9.IAD8> show route receive-protocol bgp 152.179.50.114 hidden | match 200.10.150
200.10.150.0/24 152.179.50.114 0 12956 12956 12956 12956 12956 12956 12956 19169 27947 28027 I
I added the filter, and I'm cc'ng Eric in Customer Support to let him know. It will make sense to update it across all 12956 sessions, as I only did this one… no longer hidden…
scottm@GW9.IAD8> show route receive-protocol bgp 152.179.50.114 | match 200.10.150
* 200.10.150.0/24 152.179.50.114 0 12956 12956 12956 12956 12956 12956 12956 19169 27947 28027 I
Regards...Scott
-----Original Message----- From: christopher.morrow@gmail.com [mailto:christopher.morrow@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 1:39 PM To: Gordon Cook Cc: Young, David E Subject: Re: verizon trouble ticket NJ DQ04PWR9 -- is verizon blocking FLOKsociety.org by accident or on purpose?
I always go with my standby: scott moore ... he can uncloak from bcc land if he's able/willing/etc to help in this case.
-chris
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Gordon Cook <cook@cookreport.com> wrote:
again thank you very very much. I have to leave routes huit for root canal but i do expect to be back can anyone nominate someone at verizon who would do to checking with telefonca?
david young is the only guy i know.
But question now is how to rattle a cage at verizon and possible
telefonica - I will also send word of this trouble shooting to the
folk in ecuador
=============================================================
The COOK Report on Internet Protocol, (PSTN) 609 882-2572 Back Issues:
http://www.cookreport.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gi
d=37&Itemid=61
Cook's Collaborative Edge Blog
Subscription info:
http://www.cookreport.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id
=54&Itemid=65
=============================================================
On Oct 4, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Gordon Cook <cook@cookreport.com> wrote:
Hi chris
really appreciate the help from ALL you guys
sure thing.
does what you just said mean that non reachability for version customer may mean a config problem for a small bloc and not something intentional??
that's probably hard to say... I do know that:
5 0.xe-9-2-0.GW9.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.36.30) 6.457 ms 6.821 ms
0.xe-11-2-1.GW9.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.42.2) 5.932 ms
6 telefonica-gw.customer.alter.net (152.179.50.114) 7.182 ms 5.433
ms 5.431 ms
7 Xe4-1-6-0-grtmiana2.red.telefonica-wholesale.net (94.142.123.145)
47.271 ms 48.381 ms Te0-7-0-5-grtmiana4.red.telefonica-wholesale.net
(94.142.126.182) 50.290 ms
telefonica is a 'customer' not a 'peer' of 701, based on their
connectivity. This means that telefonica has to tell 701: "Yo, I need
you to accept routes for x, y, z, ktnxbi!'
knowing the normal (well, 5yrs ago) config for customers of 701, I
don't expect there'd be special handling of this prefix either... so
I suspect either no one told 701 to accept this, or telefonica
pouched it at the handoff :(
If they didn't do that, these routes wouldn't be accepted.
If telefonica botched some filter on their side (see the comment
about prepending).
It's fairly sure though that the prefix isn't 'blackholed'... since
it's everything in the /22 not just the local /32 or /24. Bill
Herrin's on target as well, it's really hard to say from here :)
-chris
On Oct 4, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
err.. nothing in the /24 is reachable from 701's perspective (so it
seems)... so I'd suspect that there's a routing problem with the
/24, in fact the surrounding /24's also seem to be having the same problem.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Miles Fidelman
<mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> wrote:
Also inaccessible from FIOS Boston:
new-host-2:~ mfidelman$ traceroute floksociety.org traceroute to
floksociety.org (200.10.150.169), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 wireless_broadband_router (192.168.1.1) 1.534 ms 0.853 ms
0.724 ms
2 l100.bstnma-vfttp-84.verizon-gni.net (96.252.37.1) 7.619 ms
6.855 ms
7.304 ms
3 200.10.150.169 (200.10.150.169) 10.482 ms !N *^C
But just fine from our datacenter via xo.net. And the web server
is up - at least to a text browser (Lynx).
Also via Verizion cell network (Boston area).
Some kind of routing table glitch or peering issue, perhaps?
William Herrin wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Gordon Cook <cook@cookreport.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> traceroute to floksociety.org (200.10.150.169), 64 hops max, 72
>>> byte packets
>>> 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 0.759 ms 0.309 ms 0.357 ms
>>> 2 l100.cmdnnj-vfttp-26.verizon-gni.net (98.110.50.1) 36.778
>>> ms
>>> 17.508 ms 7.316 ms
>>> 3 * g0-3-4-5.cmdnnj-lcr-21.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.119)
>>> 6.482 ms !N *
>>> 4 * * g0-3-4-5.cmdnnj-lcr-21.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.119)
>>> 7.101 ms !N
>>> 5 * g0-3-4-5.cmdnnj-lcr-21.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.119)
>>> 9.239 ms !N *
>>> 6 g0-3-4-5.cmdnnj-lcr-21.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.119)
>>> 6.823 ms !N * 8.846 ms !N
>
> Inaccessible via FIOS Washington DC too:
>
> traceroute -T -p 80 200.10.150.169 traceroute to 200.10.150.169
> (200.10.150.169), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
> 1 L300.WASHDC-VFTTP-91.verizon-gni.net (173.73.47.1) 1.804 ms
> 1.595 ms 1.562 ms
> 2 G0-6-4-7.WASHDC-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net (130.81.216.250) 5.321
> ms !N
> * *
>
> Correctly accessible via Cox, Qwest, Sprint and others, but the
> network path is really slow and really long.
>
> The border is consistently with telefonica-wholesale.net and then
> telconet.net. Beyond the border there are badly behaving routers,
> including ones configured with RFC 1918 addresses. The
> addressable routers are reachable via Verizon, just not the last hop.
>
> traceroute -T -p 80 200.10.150.169 traceroute to 200.10.150.169
> (200.10.150.169), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
> 1 sark.dirtside.com (70.182.189.216) 0.708 ms 0.689 ms 0.569
> ms
> 2 10.1.192.1 (10.1.192.1) 9.957 ms 9.874 ms 9.725 ms
> 3 ip68-100-3-49.dc.dc.cox.net (68.100.3.49) 9.631 ms 9.507 ms
> 9.424 ms
> 4 ip68-100-3-113.dc.dc.cox.net (68.100.3.113) 9.310 ms 9.226
> ms
> 9.140 ms
> 5 mrfddsrj02gex070002.rd.dc.cox.net (68.100.0.145) 9.111 ms
> 9.019 ms 8.929 ms
> 6 68.1.4.139 (68.1.4.139) 8.791 ms * 5.981 ms
> 7 209.48.42.61 (209.48.42.61) 5.748 ms 11.361 ms 10.948 ms
> 8 vb2000d2.rar3.washington-dc.us.xo.net (207.88.13.66) 58.454
> ms
> 52.415 ms 52.421 ms
> 9 te-3-0-0.rar3.atlanta-ga.us.xo.net (207.88.12.9) 60.543 ms
> 60.397 ms 60.378 ms
> 10 te-3-0-0.rar3.dallas-tx.us.xo.net (207.88.12.2) 58.211 ms
> 58.407 ms 58.392 ms
> 11 * * *
> 12 206.111.5.226.ptr.us.xo.net (206.111.5.226) 53.378 ms
> 49.080 ms
> 47.435 ms
> 13 Xe-8-1-0-0-grtmiabr3.red.telefonica-wholesale.net
> (94.142.125.54)
> 76.006 ms Xe8-0-2-0-grtmiabr4.red.telefonica-wholesale.net
> (94.142.119.38) 60.181 ms
> Xe13-1-4-0-grtmiabr4.red.telefonica-wholesale.net
> (213.140.43.109)
> 125.888 ms
> 14 Te-0-2-0-0-grtmiana4.red.telefonica-wholesale.net
> (94.142.119.233)
> 67.105 ms Te0-1-0-0-grtmiana4.red.telefonica-wholesale.net
> (213.140.37.77) 63.435 ms
> Xe5-1-8-0-grtmiana2.red.telefonica-wholesale.net (213.140.36.89)
> 141.873 ms
> 15 Xe9-3-0-0-gramiana4.red.telefonica-wholesale.net
> (94.142.126.197)
> 62.450 ms 176.52.249.245 (176.52.249.245) 66.665 ms
> 176.52.249.241
> (176.52.249.241) 64.668 ms
> 16 176.52.252.66 (176.52.252.66) 118.619 ms 118.057 ms
> 117.934 ms
> 17 * * *
> 18 * * *
> 19 * * *
> 20 host-186-5-116-193.telconet.net (186.5.116.193) 122.586 ms
> 120.967 ms 115.040 ms
> 21 host-186-101-89-42.telconet.net (186.101.89.42) 122.801 ms
> 125.164 ms 119.520 ms
> 22 * * *
> 23 200.10.150.169 (200.10.150.169) 253.710 ms 246.684 ms
> 244.845 ms
>
>
>
>
>
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
participants (1)
-
Gordon Cook