12 Jan
2011
12 Jan
'11
7:03 p.m.
On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:54 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:
On 12/01/2011 01:17 p.m., George Bonser wrote:
But your security person needs to shift their thinking because the purpose of NAT and private addressing is to conserve IP address, not to provide security. With IPv6, the concept of NAT goes away.
You have heard about NAT66, right?
Yes... Hopefully it was just a bad dream. NATing IPv6 doesn't do anything good. There's no benefit, only cost. Owen