On Jan 15, 2011, at 3:30 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:06:06 -0500 (EST) Brandon Ross <bross@pobox.com> wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Brian Keefer wrote:
Actually there are a couple very compelling reasons why PAT will probably be implemented for IPv6:
You are neglecting the most important reason, much to my own disdain. Service providers will continue to assign only a single IP address to residential users unless they pay an additional fee for additional addresses.
How do you know - have you asked 100% of the service providers out there and they've said unanimously that they're only going to supply a single IPv6 address?
I've talked to a lot of them... None of the ones I've talked to have any plans to assign less than a /64 to an end-user. Hopefully the ones that are planning on less than a /48 will come to their senses. Owen