29 Jul
2020
29 Jul
'20
10:19 a.m.
On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 12:58, Vincent Bernat <bernat@luffy.cx> wrote:
I didn't test, but the documentation states:
I think only disconnect here is definition of tunnel, there are no additional headers and I don't think the document implies it and the RFC it refers to does not. I've not tried it myself, but my expectation is that internally the next-hop is represented as ipv6 with ipv4 resolution copied for L2 so I anticipate the magic to be local here and when they talk about tunnel, I suspect they refer to that adjacency as tunnel. -- ++ytti