Dave Schwartz <https://www.linkedin.com/in/schwartzdavidr/> has the answers on why in this session from NANOG (*See * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yg-qV6Fktjw; *See also generally * https://storage.googleapis.com/site-media-prod/meetings/NANOG94/5452/2025060... ) Best, AB AS54098 On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 10:03 PM Will OBrien via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
We recently turned up a new IXP and I’m going through the motions of arranging the usual peers, etc. I’m extremely surprised by this one:
Public Peering
Google no longer accepts new peering requests at internet exchanges (IXPs). However, Google maintains dedicated connectivity to the internet exchanges (IXPs) listed in our PeeringDB entry< https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/15169>. We also maintain existing BGP sessions across internet exchanges where we are connected. For networks who do not meet our PNI requirements Google will serve those networks via indirect paths.
I can only presume that someone who doesn’t pay for cross connect fees came up with this plan. This feels short sighted at the least. Considering the benefits of peering, I have to express some dismay at this disservice to the internet in general.
Anyone from Google care to explain what appears to be a willful withdrawal of support for the IXP community? _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/77ZSJJ65...