There is one very key point to make in this, use of *any* RBL is up to individual networks, no one makes anyone use them, and those that do must know and accept all risks involved when dealing with DUL's, SORBS operates a zone 'just for vernom' as well, just like spamcop and njabl and others, but if a network like many I can name want to use the full coverage , that is up to us, we know the risks and believe it does more good, EVERYTHING will have collateral damage and we know and accept that. On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 09:59, Matthew Sullivan wrote:
Actually that's debatable - the SORBS DUHL is about IPs assigned to hosts/people/machines dynamically. We do not list addresses where the ISP have sent the list explictitly saying 'these are static hosts, but they are not allowed to send mail' - similarly we do list hosts in the DUHL where the ISP has said 'these are dynamic but we allow them to send mail' - it's about the people using the SORBS DUHL for their purposes, not for helping ISPs getting around the issue of whether to use SORBS as a replacement to port 25 blocking.
Regards,
Mat