It does not for me where remote services I am using require an IP NOT a FQDN. Junos, Fortinet, AWS etc. On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 10:28 AM Josh Luthman <josh@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
Dovid - use dynamic DNS. It's generally free and there are lot of free options. That solves the problem without using a /29. I do exactly this myself at home.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 10:24 AM Dovid Bender <dovid@telecurve.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 10:15 AM Josh Luthman <josh@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
The monopoly probably exists because it's so expensive to be there. There are a ton of factors. If it was so easy, why don't you start up your own ISP (with blackjack and hookers)?
The main ISP's are Optimum and Verizon. Verizon has DSL and never built out to my area. Optimum has fiber down the block but can't be bothered to bring it to mine (why spend the money of there is no one forcing them). If starlink or anyone else had satic IP's I would jump ship.
Dovid - you didn't even answer the first question, why do you need a /29? What problem are you trying to solve with a publicly routable block?
My home IP is white listed in a lot fo equipment. I also connect to customers networks and that requires it's own IP (I can't connect from the same IP that I use for my day to day work).
On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 10:13 AM Dovid Bender <dovid@telecurve.com> wrote:
Not answering for Aaron but I almost have the same issue. Where I am there is a monopoly. My *ONLY* option is a single ISP with coax. I got a /29 from them as I needed a few static IP's. I would love if they allowed BGP and would love it even more if we went back in time 10 years and had access to fiber.....
On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 10:08 AM Josh Luthman via NANOG < nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
Aaron,
As a small operator I would ask why you need a /29 the first place. Second why don't you just get your own ASN?
Are you willing to pay more to support v6? Or do you think the ISP should add that service for free?
Imo v6 is a joke because you still need v4 for a working Internet. I understand there are benefits but this is 2025 and you can't get by without v4.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2025, 10:03 AM Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG < nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
I wish they were dropping in my area. I called my backwoods ISP last week (they are a monopoly with ~4,000 fiber customers) to go from a single static at my office to a /29 and they said "It's $300/mo". I asked why it was so high and they said "My boss doesn't like configuring them, so he set the price really high". Then I asked when IPv6 would be available and got the same answer I got back in 2019: "My boss said he was thinking about looking into it next year".
-A
On Sun, Nov 30, 2025 at 6:12 PM Tom Mitchell via NANOG < nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
> v4 addresses have been dropping rapidly. They were as high as $65 last > year. Now, there are offers for $11. Average market price now is in the > mid-$20's. All the NA ISPs have been selling much of their inventory. Why > not. > > - Tom > > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2025 at 11:23 AM Mike Hammett via NANOG < > nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote: > > > What are you using for guides for IPv4 pricing? There are a bunch of > > undated blogs, which don't mean much if there's no date. > > > > Hilco's blog says somewhere around $27 for a /22 to /24: > > https://www.ipv4.global/reports/october-2025/ > > but then fast forward a month on their auction page and it's down to $22: > > https://auctions.ipv4.global/prior-sales > > > > > > These guys stopped updating in June: > > https://ipv4market.eu/ipv4-market-average-sale-prices-2025/ > > > > > > > > ----- > > Mike Hammett > > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > Midwest-IX > > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NANOG mailing list > > > > >
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/UWJDG6X3...
> > > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > >
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/2DP5TTAH...
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/5D2RDOWM... _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/XWAJ5B7Z...