On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 20:12 -0800, Paul Ferguson wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Keith Medcalf <kmedcalf@dessus.com> wrote:
Without a warrant, there is an absolute right to privacy. It continues to exist right up until either (a) one party chooses to give up that privacy or (b) a third party arrives with a Court Order. This is simply a covenant between two parties to preserve that "private" state unless lawfully compelled by lawful process otherwise. In other words, a covenant to adhere to the rule of law and the courts in the event of any dispute between the parties or any third party. It sure seems like a good thing to me -- and a covenant I would hope anyone I do business adheres to.
That's funny.
You're assuming that the MLAT [1] process works -- it doesn't.
It "worked" against Indymedia UK: http://www.indymedia.org/fbi/ William