Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1)

rubensk> According to BCP-140, no, not a good thing. ebersman> That BCP is from 2015... rubensk> RFC 1035 is still what defines DNS, hasn't been obsoleted and rubensk> is from 1987. Perhaps age is not the main factor in defining rubensk> obsolescence ? Blind adherence to 10+ year old BCPs rather than current experience and competence is a bad idea. And 1035 has had literally hundreds of more current RFCs to clarify... Also, when someone asks for a serious "is this still a good idea" and someone just goes "BCP blah says", you're not adding to the discussion.