Precisely - I was saying that in order to add more point to your argument. I wasn't disagreeing with you :) Stefan Fouant, CISSP, JNCIE-M/T www.shortestpathfirst.net GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D
-----Original Message----- From: christopher.morrow@gmail.com [mailto:christopher.morrow@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 12:49 PM To: Stefan Fouant Cc: jul; NANOG Subject: Re: D/DoS mitigation hardware/software needed.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Stefan Fouant <sfouant@shortestpathfirst.net> wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.lists@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:05 AM
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:26 AM, jul <jul_bsd@yahoo.fr> wrote:
Martin Hannigan wrote on 05/01/10 16:50:
Outsourced services have higher cost than Arbor but can handled more.
Do they? VerizonBusiness's solution was $3250US/month so ~$90USk over 2yrs. Arbor, I think, for a TMS + collectors was +100k.
Don't forget to factor in OpEx. This can often tilt the scales in favor of one vs. the other.
sure, but just capex alone the 'make vzb do this' option wins. (I think at least, I'm not a math guy though...)