7 May
2004
7 May
'04
7:20 a.m.
On Thu, 6 May 2004 17:52:16 -0400 "Patrick W.Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net> wrote:
Unfortunately, my organization was not passive until we got to see what the threat actually was, so our numbers are not useful. Would any traffic-carrying-organization care to discuss their numbers?
<http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/historical/0109/msg01381.html> After that post, DePaul's peering sessions peaked at about 50. If I'm not mistaken, only 1 new peer would not do MD5. The number doing MD5 for the first time probably went up slightly as well. In the end, one of those organizations who wouldn't do MD5 is no longer in operation and another, well, I'm here now and that was something on my list of to-do's. :-) John