 
            
            
            
            
                27 Mar
                
                    2025
                
            
            
                27 Mar
                
                '25
                
            
            
            
        
    
                1:45 p.m.
            
        On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:37 AM Malte Tashiro via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
On 3/22/25 01:53, Chris Woodfield via NANOG wrote:
Fair point and you appear to be correct. I’ll caveat I’m speaking without concrete data, but I suspect that there are enough routes not held in RIR-hosted route servers that dropping the unauthenticated IRRs would be… impactful.
In the RIPE Connect-WG there are efforts to establish a BCP document to only use RIR IRRs for filtering.
Note that authenticating is not exclusive to RIR IRRs. TC does that too, using RIR/NIR published objects. Rubens