26 Sep
1996
26 Sep
'96
5:30 p.m.
"Perry E. Metzger" writes:
Not, you understand, that I think the global routing table should be kept in control,
Obviously that was a typo -- I think everyone agrees that the global routing table *must* be kept in control...
Do they? There is a rather large contingency of folks who feel the current paradigms of global routing necessitate a table growth explosion. Moving away from a BFR to a distributed switching system does have merits. The assumption for this model is that the routing engine for the switching systems grows exponentially. I don't really buy into this point of view, but it is there... -alan -- alan@mindvision.com