Hi Tom, Il giorno lun 31 mar 2025 alle ore 18:03 Tom Beecher <beecher@beecher.cc> ha scritto:
As the author states the data is coming from the peering DB datasets,
are you implying there is an error in the extractions/the datasets themselves? or that the data in the peering db datasets does not correlate to the real world? I believe the later but wanted to make sure I am not missing something
Example : https://burdantes.github.io/cdn_facility_evol_timeseries.html
Double click on Yahoo to select that trace. It states that Yahoo only exists in 2 interconnection facilities since December of 2023. Now take a look at PeeringDB : https://www.peeringdb.com/net/27 . We're in a lot more than 2, and have been for at least a decade, maybe two.
My assumption is that the author likely used one of our OTHER ASNs in PeeringDB , not AS10310 which is our primary one.
If *my* data displayed is so wildly incorrect, it's fair to question how accurate the data may or may not be for anyone else.
Thanks for the clarification. It makes me wonder how much that impacts the claim that pop turnover is faster than expected. Brian