[ Cc ppml, Bcc nanog ] Thus spake "Bill Woodcock" <woody@pch.net>
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
1. Entities should be able to trade in PA blocks as well, provided they are trading in at least one PI block.
They can. I'm sure their provider will be happy to oblige, for a small fee.
No, I mean that you should be able to trade in both PI and PA blocks for a single new PI block. The policy, as written, only allows trade-ins of PI blocks. See my replies to David Conrad in this thread.
2. The policy should explicitly state that no justification is required beyond that necessary to establish tenancy in the returned blocks.
How do you perceive that as being different from what's there?
I don't see any explicit reference to what justification is or isn't necessary. My fear is that the folks actually processing trade-in requests will insist on efficiency documentation (a la RFC2050) before proceeding. While I'd love to take your word that won't happen, why not make it part of the policy and eliminate any possible confusion? S Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking