None

13 Jul 2007

      d.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707122342300.29164@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4696AB85.1030407@in
oc.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707130039220.29164@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4696B668.2080807@i
noc.net> <4696C8DA.3070101@bogus.com> <4696D017.7010100@inoc.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <0B45439E-DD83-47F7-B5B7-8647EDF30A70@zill.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Patrick Giagnocavo <patrick@zill.net>
Subject: Re: peter lothberg's mother slashdotted
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:53:03 -0400
To: nanog@nanog.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
Sender: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
X-Loop: nanog
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mozart.merit.edu
X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown,
        refid=str=0001.0A090208.4696EA15.004A:SCGAP167720,ss=1,fgs=0,
        ip=198.108.1.26,
        so=2006-09-22 03:48:54,
        dmn=5.3.14/2007-05-31
Status: RO
X-Status:
X-Keywords: NonJunk
X-UID: 49

On Jul 12, 2007, at 9:06 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote:
...
I know the intention of the article was to demonstrate the
technological advantage of fiber optic networking vs. other
technologies, but to mask the article around something that seems
to indicate that "40GB to the home" is somehow the current
benchmark is incredibly unrealistic.
-Robert
What would be the best way to phrase it?  40TTH?  GTTH (gigabit to
the home)?

If you can use the Indian name for 10 million in there somewhere, you
can brag about "quad-crore" speeds ...

--Patrick