Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements

Vince Fuller writes:

I can see why you present inconsistant routes to us but I'm not sure that I understand why you'd prefer a customer prefix via a direct connection to them at one point in your network but via a connection to another provider at a different point in your network. That would seem internally inconsistant to me. Is this deliberate behavior to do shortest-exit within your network toward your customer?

We have some customers that have specifically requested this sort of arrangement. -Hank