Appreciate the apology, but that's not necessary. Just a friendly suggestion, the natural reaction from internet nerds when we see something presented with significant errors is to discount most (if not all) of the presented work. ( "If they missed that, what else did they miss?") It's worth extra caution to be as diligent as possible to avoid that. Also appreciate the fix in the graphs. Wasn't really needed; I of course know what we have, and as much as it pains me to say, I don't think Yahoo really belongs in any current conversations about 'hypergiants'. We were once, but not really in that category today. Either way , good luck and take care! On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:43 PM Loqman Salamatian via NANOG < nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
I wanted to follow up to confirm that we’ve updated the files with the corrected mapping (see https://burdantes.github.io/cdn_facility_evol_timeseries.html), and we’re also working on updating them in the blog post. If you spot any other mistakes, please don’t hesitate to reach out! _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/JDXSVWHN...