26 Sep
1996
26 Sep
'96
5:51 p.m.
"Perry E. Metzger" writes:
Not, you understand, that I think the global routing table should be kept in control,
Obviously that was a typo -- I think everyone agrees that the global routing table *must* be kept in control...
but I find it to be extraordinarily annoying that in a world where cheap PCs have been able to take 128meg on their motherboards for years (indeed, many can take far more!) and in which workstations frequently have 64M of memory in them, there are routers (many still sold!) which lack the slots to take more than 32M of memory.
Perry