On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 at 00:45, Brandon Butterworth <brandon@bogons.net> wrote:
On 15/03/2025 18:14:01, "Saku Ytti via NANOG" <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
If we consider personal safety as a more critical analog of infosec. Secret service has a budget of 3B, attacker with a budget of a hundred dollars can take a shot at the president. This is not a serious threat actor, this is the absolute least concern, and still 3B is not enough to stop it. Attacker leverage is extremely hard to cover.
That microphone could easily have been covered in Novichok
Yes, we are good at that in nanog. Whenever someone has massive outage, it was simple to address, if they just had been as good at their job as we are here. So problems appear to be simple, cheap and easy to address, if resources can be pulled from nanog-ml. -- ++ytti