14 Jan
2004
14 Jan
'04
12:22 p.m.
This was always a bad practice. One of the major networks to do this is Gone. Another had rewritten their policy to say something along the lines of "should advertise X amount of address space in aggregate or the equivalent". I don't think anyone still measures by prefixes alone. It was always the sign of cluelessness amongst those setting peering requirements. - Daniel Golding On 1/13/04 6:52 AM, "Patrick W.Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net> wrote:
On Jan 13, 2004, at 6:33 AM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
and that a large driver is to make your network look larger than it is...
What audience??
Unfortunately, I've seen Peering Policies which require things like "Must announce a minimum of 5,000 prefixes". :(