On 15 Mar 2025, at 22:46, Brandon Butterworth via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
On 15/03/2025 18:14:01, "Saku Ytti via NANOG" <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
If we consider personal safety as a more critical analog of infosec. Secret service has a budget of 3B, attacker with a budget of a hundred dollars can take a shot at the president. This is not a serious threat actor, this is the absolute least concern, and still 3B is not enough to stop it. Attacker leverage is extremely hard to cover.
That microphone could easily have been covered in Novichok
brandon
That’s the person from Qualys doing the deep *nix hackers having studied the terrain and put thought into it or TAO sneaking about owning microcontrollers in lightbulbs to steal passkey generated session tokens. Unfortunately the massively overwhelming proportion of “computer crime” is folk getting robbed on the street who were told they were safe.
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/226GTY26...