As an IX operator, that doesn't always get you anywhere. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet" <dp@datasoftcomnet.com> To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2018 6:12:48 AM Subject: Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 130, Issue 23 Hi, It's better to copy and take help of the IXP team where you are physically connected. Rgds/DP 9849111010 Sent from my iPhone. Pls excuse brevity and typos if any.
On 25-Nov-2018, at 5:30 PM, nanog-request@nanog.org wrote:
Send NANOG mailing list submissions to nanog@nanog.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to nanog-request@nanog.org
You can reach the person managing the list at nanog-owner@nanog.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of NANOG digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Amazon Peering (Mike Hammett) 2. Re: Amazon Peering (Darin Steffl) 3. Re: Amazon Peering (JASON BOTHE) 4. RE: Internet diameter? (Hal Murray) 5. DWDM forums (Ben Cannon)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 10:38:49 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net> To: Darin Steffl <darin.steffl@mnwifi.com> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Amazon Peering Message-ID: <1966321065.11280.1543077528570.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I've e-mailed my contacts there a couple times on people's behalf. No response yet.
It seems like a lot of organizations need 1 more person in their peering departments.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darin Steffl" <darin.steffl@mnwifi.com> To: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 10:21:51 PM Subject: Amazon Peering
Hey all,
Does anyone have a direct contact to get a peering session established with Amazon at an IX? I sent a peering request Dec 2017 and two more times this Sept and Nov with no response.
I sent to peering@amazon.com and received one automated response back so I know they received my email but nothing since.
--
Darin Steffl Minnesota WiFi www.mnwifi.com 507-634-WiFi Like us on Facebook -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181124/6cca0678/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 10:59:21 -0600 From: Darin Steffl <darin.steffl@mnwifi.com> To: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net> Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Amazon Peering Message-ID: <CAH-uaepqS37C43AQzoWxKk8DzT9soM3QAx1=rJ=DvpC0AOJuPg@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
It seems wasteful for Amazon to connect to an IX but then ignore peering requests for a year.
They have 40G of connectivity but are unresponsive. I'll try emailing all the other contacts listed in peeringdb.
Thanks
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018, 10:38 AM Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net wrote:
I've e-mailed my contacts there a couple times on people's behalf. No response yet.
It seems like a lot of organizations need 1 more person in their peering departments.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com
------------------------------ *From: *"Darin Steffl" <darin.steffl@mnwifi.com> *To: *"North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org> *Sent: *Friday, November 23, 2018 10:21:51 PM *Subject: *Amazon Peering
Hey all,
Does anyone have a direct contact to get a peering session established with Amazon at an IX? I sent a peering request Dec 2017 and two more times this Sept and Nov with no response.
I sent to peering@amazon.com and received one automated response back so I know they received my email but nothing since.
-- Darin Steffl Minnesota WiFi www.mnwifi.com 507-634-WiFi <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181124/a90e9544/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3 Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 11:29:57 -0600 From: JASON BOTHE <jbothe@me.com> To: Darin Steffl <darin.steffl@mnwifi.com> Cc: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net>, North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Amazon Peering Message-ID: <F274658B-DDF1-4730-900F-821222D46A75@me.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
This is a note I received on Oct18 when checking on a peering request submitted on Aug7..
“Apologies for the delays here. We have temporarily frozen IX peering as we revise some of our automation processes. I’m hopeful this will be unblocked by early November. Thank you for your continued patience.”
On Nov 24, 2018, at 10:59, Darin Steffl <darin.steffl@mnwifi.com> wrote:
It seems wasteful for Amazon to connect to an IX but then ignore peering requests for a year.
They have 40G of connectivity but are unresponsive. I'll try emailing all the other contacts listed in peeringdb.
Thanks
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018, 10:38 AM Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net wrote: I've e-mailed my contacts there a couple times on people's behalf. No response yet.
It seems like a lot of organizations need 1 more person in their peering departments.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com
From: "Darin Steffl" <darin.steffl@mnwifi.com> To: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 10:21:51 PM Subject: Amazon Peering
Hey all,
Does anyone have a direct contact to get a peering session established with Amazon at an IX? I sent a peering request Dec 2017 and two more times this Sept and Nov with no response.
I sent to peering@amazon.com and received one automated response back so I know they received my email but nothing since.
-- Darin Steffl Minnesota WiFi www.mnwifi.com 507-634-WiFi Like us on Facebook
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181124/d8823211/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4 Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:47:31 -0800 From: Hal Murray <hgm+nanog@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> To: nanog@nanog.org Cc: hgm+nanog@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net Subject: RE: Internet diameter? Message-ID: <20181125014731.C27B040605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Keith Medcalf said:
"just static content" would be more accurate ...
and using http rather than https
There were many attempts at this by Johhny-cum-lately ISPs back in the 90's -- particularly Telco and Cableco's -- with their "transparent poxies". Eventually they discovered that it was more cost efficient to actually provide the customer with what the customer had purchased.
One of the complications in this area is an extra layer of logging which could turn into privacy invasion.
I'm pretty sure it was Comcast, but a quick search didn't find a good reference. Many years ago, there were a lot of complaints when customers discovered that their transparent proxy web site traffic was getting logged. Comcast said they weren't using it for anything beyond normal operations work, but nobody believed them. Shortly after that, they gave up on proxying.
I'm sure the general reputation of modern Telcos and Cablecos for privacy invasion didn't help.
-- These are my opinions. I hate spam.
------------------------------
Message: 5 Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 22:05:05 -0800 From: Ben Cannon <ben@6by7.net> To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: DWDM forums Message-ID: <5C6667D7-0CF2-4801-840F-C67F213D1F04@6by7.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Apologies for the noise, but can anyone recommend some DWDM or other glass/laser/amplifier communities or forums? There has to be a ton of overlap with this group. -Ben.
End of NANOG Digest, Vol 130, Issue 23 **************************************