lists.nanog.org
Sign In Sign Up
Manage this list Sign In Sign Up

Keyboard Shortcuts

Thread View

  • j: Next unread message
  • k: Previous unread message
  • j a: Jump to all threads
  • j l: Jump to MailingList overview
thread

Re:

Jeff Haas

9 Jan 2001 9 Jan '01
12:18 p.m.

On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:37:32AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:

...

here i quibble. i don't really like either reflectors or route servers. let's ignore route servers.

:-)

...

so, rather than do the rr thing, which is labor intensive and a dead end in the long run, just jump to routers that can handle it, like small 36xx (or 26xx if they have the ram, i really don't know that end of your products well).

Many small providers aren't very good at filtering their routes in the first place. Sloppiness in a mini-nap is expected. One person with a little clue and a route server can make _everyones_ lives easier in such a situation. Scaling routers is relatively easy. Scaling clue is harder. :-) (Note that I wont disagree that in such a situation, full-mesh peering is a very viable option.)

...

randy

-- Jeffrey Haas - Merit RSng project - jeffhaas@merit.edu

0 0
Reply
Sign in to reply online Use email software

Back to the thread

Back to the list

HyperKitty Powered by HyperKitty version 1.3.12.