It's worth asking Google (or any peer) if they're willing to share XC costs. Usually this is in the form of "I buy one, you buy the other" On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 2:07 AM Will OBrien via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
We recently turned up a new IXP and I’m going through the motions of arranging the usual peers, etc. I’m extremely surprised by this one:
Public Peering
Google no longer accepts new peering requests at internet exchanges (IXPs). However, Google maintains dedicated connectivity to the internet exchanges (IXPs) listed in our PeeringDB entry< https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/15169>. We also maintain existing BGP sessions across internet exchanges where we are connected. For networks who do not meet our PNI requirements Google will serve those networks via indirect paths.
I can only presume that someone who doesn’t pay for cross connect fees came up with this plan. This feels short sighted at the least. Considering the benefits of peering, I have to express some dismay at this disservice to the internet in general.
Anyone from Google care to explain what appears to be a willful withdrawal of support for the IXP community? _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/77ZSJJ65...