18 May
1998
18 May
'98
6:06 p.m.
On Mon, 18 May 1998, Blake Willis wrote:
Would it be terribly unreasonable to suggest assigning a reserved /24 explicitly for internal ISP services such as those listed below, and write up some sort of rfc for the whole ordeal, so that there are no conflicts with 1918 space?
-Blake
Anyone care to co-author an RFC suggesting a sensible global standard for "local" mail relays, time servers, resolvers etc so that dial-in people can roam without getting filtered, blocked etc?
How about defining 192.x.y.port-number, where port-number is the port number of the service. 192.x.y.53 is the DNS server, etc.. Nah, good idea, but too many useful services with port numbers > 255, so it doesn't work too well. -Phil