2 Mar
2025
2 Mar
'25
10:09 p.m.
On 3/2/25 2:04 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 10:55 AM Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net> wrote:
| Subject: [NANOG]Re:
Congrats on completing the move to Mailman 3 but is this Subject line mangling truly necessary? It has been standard for mailing lists for a quarter of a century now. Isn't it time NANOG caught up with mailing list best practices?
FWIW, the old configuration didn't mark up the subject or add a footer which has the advantage of not breaking the originating DKIM signature. I had always assumed that that was on purpose. Mike