13 Apr
2009
13 Apr
'09
7:16 p.m.
Peter Beckman [mailto:beckman@angryox.com] wrote:
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 11:19 AM To: Dylan Ebner Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Fiber cut in SF area
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Dylan Ebner wrote:
It will be easier to get more divergence than secure all the manholes in the country.
I still think skipping the securing of manholes and access points in favor of active monitoring with offsite access is a better solution.
The only thing missing from your plan was a cost analysis. Cost of each, plus operational costs, * however many of each type. How much would that be? Then amortize that out to our bills. Extra credit: would you pay for it? Chris