30 Apr
2025
30 Apr
'25
5:08 p.m.
Take a look at TWAMP, which may solve your problems. Shane
On Apr 30, 2025, at 7:56 AM, James Bensley via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:
latency, and packet loss of the service, and in the case of multi-segment pseudowires check this e2e, and for each segment. We also wanted to provide link-loss forwarding for the services. Finally, we wanted to allow our customers to also use CFM over our service, so we used levels 0-3 internally, and passed levels 4-7 transparently