4 May
                
                    2009
                
            
            
                4 May
                
                '09
                
            
            
            
        
    
                1:20 p.m.
            
        Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
It's short sighted and silly to design your service around handing out /64s to people and then you have to redesign it when demand for multiple subnets come around. Design it around /56 to begin with, and you will have solved the problem for the future, not just for now.
Then tell RIR's to quit insisting that /56's have SWIP's. They can't very well be dynamic in nature via PD if they are being SWIP'd. Until then, /60 sounds fine. Allows higher capacity per /48 on a node and will give most customers more than they will ever use. Jack