On 19/Jul/18 01:21, Job Snijders wrote:
@ all - It would be good if operators ask their vendors if they can get behind this I-D https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-clarify
I'm actually glad to see this (Randy, you've abandoned me, hehe). We actually hit and troubleshot both these issues together with Randy and a bunch of many good folk in the operator and vendor community back in 2016/2017, where we discovered that Cisco were marking all iBGP routes as Valid by default, and automatically applying RPKI policy on routes without actual operator input. The latter issue was actually officially documented as part of how the implementation works over at Cisco-land, but the former was a direct violation of the RFC. These issues were eventually fixed later in 2017, but glad to see that there is an I-D that proposes this more firmly! Thanks, Randy! Mark.