Is adding equipment to the covered list considered rule making? The FCC could also use the excuse of The Good Cause Exception. It would have to go to court for either to be clarified. From: Mike Lewinski via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2026 7:41 AM To: nanog@lists.nanog.org Cc: Mike Lewinski <mlewinski@massivenetworks.com> Subject: [External Sender] Re: FCC issues new rules about foreign made routers CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Normal rulemaking goes through a comment period, as required by the Administrative Procedures Act. The end goal of the APA is to prevent "arbitrary and capricious" regulations. Given that we are hearing about this now, and not when the comment period notice was issued, I expect an injunction shortly, and eventual rulings that this violates APA. _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/SLTJM6MIRWYBYUC7RS2SKE6YAPQIUSVW/<https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/SLTJM6MIRWYBYUC7RS2SKE6YAPQIUSVW> Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast, a leader in email security and cyber resilience. Mimecast integrates email defenses with brand protection, security awareness training, web security, compliance and other essential capabilities. Mimecast helps protect large and small organizations from malicious activity, human error and technology failure; and to lead the movement toward building a more resilient world. To find out more, visit our website.